Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
George Bush has had his bluff called. The House of Representatives passed the FISA bill today which if penned into law would give the intel...
-
The TSA and the Airline industry this week got into a big battle over airline safety. It would seem that a TSA inspector attempting to det...
-
Senator Joe Biden (D-Delaware) has introduced an interesting bill that promises to redefine the way the government looks at drug and alcoho...
-
Note: Cross posted from Softduit Media . Permalink Between now and the end of BlogWorld in mid October, we are going to run a WordPress Th...
-
David Addington, one of Dick Cheney's top advisors, told the Senate that he was not the person responsible for drafting the legal memo ...
-
To much Junk definitely causes gridlock in traffic, in politics, in finances, in life and in spirit. Here's 9 suggestions to reduce the...
-
It's still early in Michigan, regardless of the time zone you look at, and it is possible that Michigan might just yield a third Republi...
-
This recession has been dubbed as possibly one of the worst in history, maybe even worse than the recession experienced during the Great Dep...
-
For people have lost power in Florida today following a number of lightning and thunder storms it went to the area. The power outage is mass...
-
Harry Potter has won a real life duel against a local Georgia witch (ex-witch) and a local missionary mother. Starting last fall Laura Mal...
Powered by Blogger.
Saturday, August 19, 2006
Detroit Federal Judge Chooses Constitution over Bush Wire tapping
Judge Anna diggs Taylor sits on the US District Court in Detroit. She was appointed during the Carter administration. She ruled that the governments wiretapping program of international communications violated the constitution. Her ruling does not impact the wiretapping of national communications nor does it impact the NSA's monitoring of internet communications from web searches, to emails to surfing habits, messaging and more.
The Argus of InsideBayArea.com quoted her as stating,
The Argus of InsideBayArea.com quoted her as stating,
"The public interest is clear in this matter," Taylor wrote. "It is the upholding of our Constitution."
In bypassing court warrants, the judge said, the government has sought the unilateral power to decide when surveillance is required.
"It was never the intent of the framers to give the president such unfettered control, particularly when his actions blatantly disregard the parameters clearly enumerated in the Bill of Rights," she wrote. "The three separate branches of government were developed as a check and balance for one another."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(Atom)
0 comments: